ALTAANZ
  • About ALTAANZ
  • ALTAANZ Committee
    • Current Committee
    • Past Committees >
      • 2024 Committee
      • 2022 - 2023 Committee
      • 2021 Committee
      • 2020 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2018 - 2019 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2017 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2016 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2015 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2014 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2013 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2012 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2011 ALTAANZ Committee
  • Events
    • ALTAANZ Online Conference 2025 >
      • Call for Proposals 2025
      • Registration 2025
      • Keynote Speakers
    • Past Conferences >
      • The Applied Linguistics ALAA/ALANZ/ALTAANZ Conference 2024
      • ALTAANZ Online Conference 2023 >
        • Program 2023
        • Plenary Sessions 2023
        • Registration 2023
        • Conference Committee 2023
      • ALANZ - ALAA - ALTAANZ 2022
      • ALTAANZ Online Research Forum 2021
      • LTRC/ALTAANZ Online Celebratory event 2020 >
        • About the event
        • Event Programme
        • LTRC Anniversary Symposium
      • ALANZ / ALAA / ALTAANZ Auckland 2017
      • ALTAANZ Conference Auckland 2016 >
        • Keynote Speakers >
          • Plenary Abstracts
        • Teachers' Day
        • Pre-conference workshops
        • Conference programme
      • ALTAANZ Conference Brisbane 2014
      • ALTAANZ Conference Sydney 2012
    • Past Workshops >
      • LTRC / ALTAANZ Workshops July 2014 >
        • Test analysis for teachers
        • Diagnostic assessment in the language classroom
        • Responding to student writing
        • Assessing Pragmatics
        • Introduction to Rasch measurement
        • Introduction to many-facet Rasch measurement
      • LTRC / ALTAANZ workshops September 2015 >
        • A Practical Approach to Questionnaire Construction for Language Assessment Research
        • Integrating self- and peer-assessment into the language classroom
        • Implementing and assessing collaborative writing activities
        • Assessing Vocabulary
        • Revisiting language constructs
  • SiLA Journal
    • About SiLA
    • SiLA Publication Policies
    • Early View Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues >
      • 2024
      • 2023
      • 2022
      • 2021
      • 2020
      • 2019
      • 2018
      • 2017
      • 2016
      • 2015
      • 2014
      • 2013
      • 2012
    • Editorial Board
    • Submission Guidelines
  • Awards
    • ALTAANZ Best Student Paper Award
    • Penny McKay Award
    • PLTA Best Paper Award
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Newsletter: Language Assessment Matters
  • Join ALTAANZ
  • Contact us
Picture
The efficacy of automated feedback on summary content in an online formative assessment module for undergraduate L2 writing instruction in Japan
Yasuyo Sawaki, Waseda University, Japan
Yutaka Ishii, Chiba University, Japan
Yoko Oi, Seisen University, Japan

https://doi.org/10.58379/MJFP3942
Volume 13, Issue 2, 2024
Abstract: The present mixed-methods study examined the efficacy of W-Writing, an online formative assessment module for summary writing designed for supplemental use in undergraduate introductory academic writing courses in Japan to enhance summary writing instruction under the new normal that emerged after the COVID pandemic. This module automatically delivered four types of content feedback inspired by the formative assessment and learning-oriented assessment (LOA) literature during the revision stage of a summary writing task. The efficacy of the immediate content feedback was examined from two perspectives: students’ revision behaviors and students’ and instructors’ perceptions of the W-Writing module. Students enrolled in the course and four course instructors participated in this study. A frequency analysis of revision operations applied to the initial summary draft of 60 randomly selected students during revisions suggested that they were engaged in meaningful revision activities. The students’ rating of the usefulness of W-Writing (n = 81) was also high. These results were corroborated by results from a thematic analysis conducted on instructors’ interview data, which suggested the instructors’ high endorsement of W-Writing’s usefulness and their perceptions of students’ high engagement in W-Writing activities. The above results provide initial empirical support for the efficacy of the W-Writing feedback design. 
Keywords: automated writing evaluation (AWE), formative assessment, learning-oriented assessment (LOA), technology-mediated feedback, summary writing
Click to download Full Text