ALTAANZ
  • About ALTAANZ
  • ALTAANZ Committee
    • Current Committee
    • Past Committees >
      • 2024 Committee
      • 2022 - 2023 Committee
      • 2021 Committee
      • 2020 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2018 - 2019 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2017 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2016 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2015 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2014 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2013 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2012 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2011 ALTAANZ Committee
  • Events
    • ALTAANZ Online conference 2025 >
      • Conference info
      • ALTAANZ conference registration 2025
      • Keynote Speakers
      • Featured sessions
      • ALTAANZ 2025 Mentor-mentee program
    • Past Conferences >
      • The Applied Linguistics ALAA/ALANZ/ALTAANZ Conference 2024
      • ALTAANZ Online Conference 2023 >
        • Program 2023
        • Plenary Sessions 2023
        • Registration 2023
        • Conference Committee 2023
      • ALANZ - ALAA - ALTAANZ 2022
      • ALTAANZ Online Research Forum 2021
      • LTRC/ALTAANZ Online Celebratory event 2020 >
        • About the event
        • Event Programme
        • LTRC Anniversary Symposium
      • ALANZ / ALAA / ALTAANZ Auckland 2017
      • ALTAANZ Conference Auckland 2016 >
        • Keynote Speakers >
          • Plenary Abstracts
        • Teachers' Day
        • Pre-conference workshops
        • Conference programme
      • ALTAANZ Conference Brisbane 2014
      • ALTAANZ Conference Sydney 2012
    • Past Workshops >
      • LTRC / ALTAANZ Workshops July 2014 >
        • Test analysis for teachers
        • Diagnostic assessment in the language classroom
        • Responding to student writing
        • Assessing Pragmatics
        • Introduction to Rasch measurement
        • Introduction to many-facet Rasch measurement
      • LTRC / ALTAANZ workshops September 2015 >
        • A Practical Approach to Questionnaire Construction for Language Assessment Research
        • Integrating self- and peer-assessment into the language classroom
        • Implementing and assessing collaborative writing activities
        • Assessing Vocabulary
        • Revisiting language constructs
  • SiLA Journal
    • About SiLA
    • SiLA Publication Policies
    • Early View Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues >
      • 2024
      • 2023
      • 2022
      • 2021
      • 2020
      • 2019
      • 2018
      • 2017
      • 2016
      • 2015
      • 2014
      • 2013
      • 2012
    • Editorial Board
    • Submission Guidelines
  • Awards
    • SiLA Best Paper Award
    • PLTA Best Paper Award 2013-2021
    • ALTAANZ Best Student Journal Article Award
    • ALTAANZ Best Student Paper Award
    • Penny McKay Award
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Newsletter: Language Assessment Matters
  • Resources
    • Best practice in language testing & assessment
  • Join ALTAANZ
  • Contact us
Picture
Syntactic and lexical evolution in L2 writing through the lenses of Dynamic Systems Theory
Reza Kalantari, Research Institute for Education, Iran & Javad Gholami, Urmia University, Iran
https://doi.org/10.58379/BGJT9542​
Volume 14, Issue 1, 2025
Abstract: This longitudinal, descriptive-exploratory case-study examined Iranian EFL learners’ writing complexity through the lenses of Dynamic Systems Theory (DST). One hundred and twenty independent essays written by 12 intermediate to advanced female EFL learners in a TOEFL iBT preparation course over six months constituted the 43,478-word learner-generated corpus of this study. L2 Syntactic Complexity Analyzer was employed to analyze the length of production, sentence complexity, subordination, coordination, and particular structures. Moreover, three lexical analysis software programs including Coh-Metrix, Lexical Complexity Analyzer, and VocabProfile were employed to measure lexical density, diversity, and sophistication. The results of repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated significant differences between time and mean scores in five out of 14 syntactic indices. Correlational analyses among syntactic indices revealed positive relationships among the measures of the same sub-dimension of syntactic complexity. Meanwhile, particular structures enjoyed a positive correlation with both coordination and length of production. The analysis of syntactic and lexical relationships revealed that mean length of sentence, mean length of T-unit and mean length of clause closely corresponded with only lexical diversity. However, these syntactic indices revealed no significant correlations with both lexical density and sophistication. The findings suggest that different syntactic and lexical dimensions interactively comprise L2 writing complexity. 
Keywords: Dynamic Systems Theory, lexical complexity, syntactic complexity
Click to download Full Text