ALTAANZ
  • About ALTAANZ
  • ALTAANZ Committee
  • Past Committees
    • 2025 Committee
    • 2024 Committee
    • 2022 - 2023 Committee
    • 2021 Committee
    • 2020 ALTAANZ Committee
    • 2018 - 2019 ALTAANZ Committee
    • 2017 ALTAANZ Committee
    • 2016 ALTAANZ Committee
    • 2015 ALTAANZ Committee
    • 2014 ALTAANZ Committee
    • 2013 ALTAANZ Committee
    • 2012 ALTAANZ Committee
    • 2011 ALTAANZ Committee
  • Events
    • ALTAANZ Online conference 2025 >
      • Conference info
      • ALTAANZ conference registration 2025
      • Keynote Speakers
      • Featured sessions
      • ALTAANZ 2025 Mentor-mentee program
    • Past Conferences >
      • The Applied Linguistics ALAA/ALANZ/ALTAANZ Conference 2024
      • ALTAANZ Online Conference 2023 >
        • Program 2023
        • Plenary Sessions 2023
        • Registration 2023
        • Conference Committee 2023
      • ALANZ - ALAA - ALTAANZ 2022
      • ALTAANZ Online Research Forum 2021
      • LTRC/ALTAANZ Online Celebratory event 2020 >
        • About the event
        • Event Programme
        • LTRC Anniversary Symposium
      • ALANZ / ALAA / ALTAANZ Auckland 2017
      • ALTAANZ Conference Auckland 2016 >
        • Keynote Speakers >
          • Plenary Abstracts
        • Teachers' Day
        • Pre-conference workshops
        • Conference programme
      • ALTAANZ Conference Brisbane 2014
      • ALTAANZ Conference Sydney 2012
    • Past Workshops >
      • LTRC / ALTAANZ Workshops July 2014 >
        • Test analysis for teachers
        • Diagnostic assessment in the language classroom
        • Responding to student writing
        • Assessing Pragmatics
        • Introduction to Rasch measurement
        • Introduction to many-facet Rasch measurement
      • LTRC / ALTAANZ workshops September 2015 >
        • A Practical Approach to Questionnaire Construction for Language Assessment Research
        • Integrating self- and peer-assessment into the language classroom
        • Implementing and assessing collaborative writing activities
        • Assessing Vocabulary
        • Revisiting language constructs
  • SiLA Journal
    • About SiLA
    • SiLA Publication Policies
    • Early View Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues >
      • 2025
      • 2024
      • 2023
      • 2022
      • 2021
      • 2020
      • 2019
      • 2018
      • 2017
      • 2016
      • 2015
      • 2014
      • 2013
      • 2012
    • Editorial Board
    • Submission Guidelines
  • Awards
    • SiLA Best Paper Award
    • PLTA Best Paper Award 2013-2021
    • ALTAANZ Best Student Journal Article Award
    • ALTAANZ Best Student Paper Award
    • Penny McKay Award
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Newsletter: Language Assessment Matters
  • Resources
    • Best practice in language testing & assessment
  • Join ALTAANZ
  • Contact us
Picture
Different, or simply more difficult? The role of reduced time in the construct of computerised C-Tests in English and German
Anna Timukova, g.a.s.t. (Society for Academic Study Preparation and Test Development),Germany
Franziska Möller, g.a.s.t. (Society for Academic Study Preparation and Test Development), Germany
Anastasia Drackert, g.a.s.t. (Society for Academic Study Preparation and Test Development), Ruhr University of Bochum, Germany
https://doi.org/10.58379/USDT5701
Volume 15, Issue 1, 2026
Abstract: Speeded C-Tests are a time-constrained variation of the traditional C-Test, requiring test takers to complete partial word gaps in increasingly complex short texts within about two minutes per text, compared to the standard five. While the original C-Test is a well-established measure of global language proficiency, the speeded version – promising greater reliability and cost-effectiveness – remains underexplored. Reducing time typically increases test difficulty due to the speed-ability trade-off but may also shift the construct by altering the skills assessed. The study examined university students’ performance on computerised C-Tests in L2 English (N = 237) and German (N = 191) under two timing conditions. Time constraints significantly lowered scores in both languages, although the effect was small. Less proficient learners were more affected, but the difference in point loss was not statistically significant. An interaction between time and text difficulty was observed in German, but not in English. The speeded C-Test showed slightly stronger correlations with oral proficiency and marginally better predictive power in both samples, particularly among more advanced learners. In sum, the speeded C-Test is more difficult and appears to emphasise automatised, oral-like language skills, with the construct being sensitive to proficiency and (in German) text difficulty.
Keywords: global language proficiency, placement test, speeded testing, computerised language testing
Click to download Full Text