ALTAANZ
  • About ALTAANZ
  • ALTAANZ Committee
  • Past Committees
    • 2025 Committee
    • 2024 Committee
    • 2022 - 2023 Committee
    • 2021 Committee
    • 2020 ALTAANZ Committee
    • 2018 - 2019 ALTAANZ Committee
    • 2017 ALTAANZ Committee
    • 2016 ALTAANZ Committee
    • 2015 ALTAANZ Committee
    • 2014 ALTAANZ Committee
    • 2013 ALTAANZ Committee
    • 2012 ALTAANZ Committee
    • 2011 ALTAANZ Committee
  • Events
    • ALTAANZ Online conference 2025 >
      • Conference info
      • ALTAANZ conference registration 2025
      • Keynote Speakers
      • Featured sessions
      • ALTAANZ 2025 Mentor-mentee program
    • Past Conferences >
      • The Applied Linguistics ALAA/ALANZ/ALTAANZ Conference 2024
      • ALTAANZ Online Conference 2023 >
        • Program 2023
        • Plenary Sessions 2023
        • Registration 2023
        • Conference Committee 2023
      • ALANZ - ALAA - ALTAANZ 2022
      • ALTAANZ Online Research Forum 2021
      • LTRC/ALTAANZ Online Celebratory event 2020 >
        • About the event
        • Event Programme
        • LTRC Anniversary Symposium
      • ALANZ / ALAA / ALTAANZ Auckland 2017
      • ALTAANZ Conference Auckland 2016 >
        • Keynote Speakers >
          • Plenary Abstracts
        • Teachers' Day
        • Pre-conference workshops
        • Conference programme
      • ALTAANZ Conference Brisbane 2014
      • ALTAANZ Conference Sydney 2012
    • Past Workshops >
      • LTRC / ALTAANZ Workshops July 2014 >
        • Test analysis for teachers
        • Diagnostic assessment in the language classroom
        • Responding to student writing
        • Assessing Pragmatics
        • Introduction to Rasch measurement
        • Introduction to many-facet Rasch measurement
      • LTRC / ALTAANZ workshops September 2015 >
        • A Practical Approach to Questionnaire Construction for Language Assessment Research
        • Integrating self- and peer-assessment into the language classroom
        • Implementing and assessing collaborative writing activities
        • Assessing Vocabulary
        • Revisiting language constructs
  • SiLA Journal
    • About SiLA
    • SiLA Publication Policies
    • Early View Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues >
      • 2025
      • 2024
      • 2023
      • 2022
      • 2021
      • 2020
      • 2019
      • 2018
      • 2017
      • 2016
      • 2015
      • 2014
      • 2013
      • 2012
    • Editorial Board
    • Submission Guidelines
  • Awards
    • SiLA Best Paper Award
    • PLTA Best Paper Award 2013-2021
    • ALTAANZ Best Student Journal Article Award
    • ALTAANZ Best Student Paper Award
    • Penny McKay Award
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Newsletter: Language Assessment Matters
  • Resources
    • Best practice in language testing & assessment
  • Join ALTAANZ
  • Contact us
Picture
Argument-based validation of the English-Japanese Phrasal Vocabulary Size Test: The role of familiarity in item difficulty
Ayako Aizawa, Rikkyo University, Japan
https://doi.org/10.58379/ZGLL8167
Volume 15, Issue 1, 2026
Abstract: This study validates the English–Japanese Phrasal Vocabulary Size Test (E–J PVST), a bilingual adaptation of the Phrasal Vocabulary Size Test (Martinez, 2011) assessing receptive knowledge of high-frequency English phrasal expressions among L1 Japanese adults. Using Chapelle et al.’s (2008) argument-based validation framework, evidence is synthesized for the domain definition, evaluation, generalization, and explanation inferences. The test was administered online to 226 adults spanning CEFR A1 to C1. Rasch analyses indicated high item reliability (.97) and person reliability (.88), and provided provisional support for a largely unidimensional structure. However, 12% of items showed underfit and 22% showed overfit, with distractor malfunction identified as a primary source of misfit. Scores increased monotonically across CEFR levels. Learner-reported familiarity was significantly correlated with item difficulty, whereas corpus frequency was not, with more familiar expressions tending to be easier. The study demonstrates that argument-based validation can identify specific strengths and weaknesses in low-stakes vocabulary tests, and highlights the role of subjective familiarity, more than corpus frequency, in predicting item difficulty for multiword expressions.
Keywords: multiword expressions, phrasal expressions, vocabulary testing, argument-based validation
Click to download Full Text