ALTAANZ
  • About ALTAANZ
  • ALTAANZ Committee
    • Current Committee
    • Past Committees >
      • 2024 Committee
      • 2022 - 2023 Committee
      • 2021 Committee
      • 2020 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2018 - 2019 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2017 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2016 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2015 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2014 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2013 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2012 ALTAANZ Committee
      • 2011 ALTAANZ Committee
  • Events
    • ALTAANZ Online conference 2025 >
      • Conference info
      • ALTAANZ conference registration 2025
      • Keynote Speakers
      • Featured sessions
      • ALTAANZ 2025 Mentor-mentee program
    • Past Conferences >
      • The Applied Linguistics ALAA/ALANZ/ALTAANZ Conference 2024
      • ALTAANZ Online Conference 2023 >
        • Program 2023
        • Plenary Sessions 2023
        • Registration 2023
        • Conference Committee 2023
      • ALANZ - ALAA - ALTAANZ 2022
      • ALTAANZ Online Research Forum 2021
      • LTRC/ALTAANZ Online Celebratory event 2020 >
        • About the event
        • Event Programme
        • LTRC Anniversary Symposium
      • ALANZ / ALAA / ALTAANZ Auckland 2017
      • ALTAANZ Conference Auckland 2016 >
        • Keynote Speakers >
          • Plenary Abstracts
        • Teachers' Day
        • Pre-conference workshops
        • Conference programme
      • ALTAANZ Conference Brisbane 2014
      • ALTAANZ Conference Sydney 2012
    • Past Workshops >
      • LTRC / ALTAANZ Workshops July 2014 >
        • Test analysis for teachers
        • Diagnostic assessment in the language classroom
        • Responding to student writing
        • Assessing Pragmatics
        • Introduction to Rasch measurement
        • Introduction to many-facet Rasch measurement
      • LTRC / ALTAANZ workshops September 2015 >
        • A Practical Approach to Questionnaire Construction for Language Assessment Research
        • Integrating self- and peer-assessment into the language classroom
        • Implementing and assessing collaborative writing activities
        • Assessing Vocabulary
        • Revisiting language constructs
  • SiLA Journal
    • About SiLA
    • SiLA Publication Policies
    • Early View Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues >
      • 2025
      • 2024
      • 2023
      • 2022
      • 2021
      • 2020
      • 2019
      • 2018
      • 2017
      • 2016
      • 2015
      • 2014
      • 2013
      • 2012
    • Editorial Board
    • Submission Guidelines
  • Awards
    • SiLA Best Paper Award
    • PLTA Best Paper Award 2013-2021
    • ALTAANZ Best Student Journal Article Award
    • ALTAANZ Best Student Paper Award
    • Penny McKay Award
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Newsletter: Language Assessment Matters
  • Resources
    • Best practice in language testing & assessment
  • Join ALTAANZ
  • Contact us
Word recognition skill and academic success across disciplines in an ELF university setting
Michael Harrington, University of Queensland, Australia
Thomas Roche, Southern Cross University College, Australia

https://doi.org/10.58379/QPEW8104
Volume 3, Issue 2, 2014
Abstract: Previous research (Harrington & Roche, 2014) showed that the Timed Yes/No Test (a measure of vocabulary size and response speed) is an effective tool for screening undergraduate students at risk of failure in English-as-a-Lingua-Franca (ELF) university settings. This study examines how well performance on the test predicts grade point averages across different academic disciplines in one of those contexts, an ELF university in Oman. First year students (N= 280) from four academic disciplines (Humanities, IT, Business and Engineering) completed Basic and Advanced versions of the Timed Yes/No Test. The predictive validity of word recognition accuracy (a proxy for size) and response time measures on GPA outcomes were examined independently and in combination. Two patterns emerged. Word accuracy was a better predictor of academic performance than response time for three of the groups, Engineering the exception, accounting for as much as 25% of variance in GPA. Response time accounted for no additional unique variance in the three groups after accuracy scores were accounted for. In contrast, accuracy was not a significant predictor of GPA for the Engineering group but response time was, accounting for 40% of the variance in academic performance. The findings are related to the use of the Timed Yes/No Test as a reliable and cost-effective screening tool in Post Enrolment Language Assessment (PELA) applications in ELF settings. 
Keywords: vocabulary size, recognition speed, academic performance, screening, academic English
Click to download Full Text