Submit a proposal (by April 29 2016)
Proposals for ALTAANZ 2016 are categorised below.
1. Papers
This format is best suited to theoretically oriented work, or the presentation of completed research studies and assessment development projects. Paper presentations are 20 minutes and are followed by 10 minutes for questions and comments from the audience. Given the time constraint, the proposal should clearly indicate what the presentation will focus on, as well as giving details of the whole project. In the case of empirical studies, the proposal should in general include objectives of the study, study design and methods, results, conclusions, and implications. In the case of conceptual research, the proposal should discuss an approach or a critical issue, or compare and contrast alternative approaches or issues, and provide significant new insights. The proposal must not exceed 300 words. Papers that are not accepted may be offered a poster slot.
2. Symposia
Symposia involve multiple presenters focusing on a single theme and are best suited for the discussion of research, theory, practice, and associated issues. They should not be a series of independent presentations but should offer complementary or differing perspectives on an important topic or issue that can stimulate wider discussion. Symposia may last up to 90 minutes and may include up to four individual presenters, a moderator, and an independent discussant. An organizer may also act as a participant or moderator. Evidence of careful planning for the implementation of the symposium (e.g., goals, timing, summaries of perspectives) should be included in the proposal. The proposal should include a 300-word summary of the topic, focusing on how the perspectives represented in the individual papers complement one another. In addition, abstracts of individual papers not exceeding 250 words each should be included.
3. Posters
Posters provide an opportunity for the presentation of test development projects, technological innovations and current assessment practice in the classroom. Posters are displayed on a specific day. Presenters should be available to discuss their work and answer questions. The proposal must not exceed 300 words.
4. Work in Progress Presentations
This conference session gives the opportunity for presenters to discuss work in progress, in the form of either a research study or a project to develop a particular type of assessment for practical use. Presenters give a brief overview of what they have done, any issues they are dealing with and what their future plans are, as the basis for generating useful feedback from a small group of other participants. The session will be organised so that each presenter meets with three different groups for 20 minutes each. The proposal must not exceed 300 words.
1. Papers
This format is best suited to theoretically oriented work, or the presentation of completed research studies and assessment development projects. Paper presentations are 20 minutes and are followed by 10 minutes for questions and comments from the audience. Given the time constraint, the proposal should clearly indicate what the presentation will focus on, as well as giving details of the whole project. In the case of empirical studies, the proposal should in general include objectives of the study, study design and methods, results, conclusions, and implications. In the case of conceptual research, the proposal should discuss an approach or a critical issue, or compare and contrast alternative approaches or issues, and provide significant new insights. The proposal must not exceed 300 words. Papers that are not accepted may be offered a poster slot.
2. Symposia
Symposia involve multiple presenters focusing on a single theme and are best suited for the discussion of research, theory, practice, and associated issues. They should not be a series of independent presentations but should offer complementary or differing perspectives on an important topic or issue that can stimulate wider discussion. Symposia may last up to 90 minutes and may include up to four individual presenters, a moderator, and an independent discussant. An organizer may also act as a participant or moderator. Evidence of careful planning for the implementation of the symposium (e.g., goals, timing, summaries of perspectives) should be included in the proposal. The proposal should include a 300-word summary of the topic, focusing on how the perspectives represented in the individual papers complement one another. In addition, abstracts of individual papers not exceeding 250 words each should be included.
3. Posters
Posters provide an opportunity for the presentation of test development projects, technological innovations and current assessment practice in the classroom. Posters are displayed on a specific day. Presenters should be available to discuss their work and answer questions. The proposal must not exceed 300 words.
4. Work in Progress Presentations
This conference session gives the opportunity for presenters to discuss work in progress, in the form of either a research study or a project to develop a particular type of assessment for practical use. Presenters give a brief overview of what they have done, any issues they are dealing with and what their future plans are, as the basis for generating useful feedback from a small group of other participants. The session will be organised so that each presenter meets with three different groups for 20 minutes each. The proposal must not exceed 300 words.
evaluation criteria
Evaluation criteria
Criteria used to evaluate papers will be:
- Interest and importance to the field of language assessment
- Clarity and completeness of the proposal
- Quality of the work to be reported
- Relevance to the conference theme
Criteria used to evaluate symposia will be:
- Interest and importance to the field of language assessment
- Coherence and complementarity of the contributions
- Evidence of careful planning for the implementation of the symposium, including sufficient time for discussion and audience participation
- Relevance to the conference theme
Criteria used to evaluate posters and work in progress presentations will be:
- Interest and importance to the field of language assessment
- Clarity and completeness of the proposal
- Quality of the work to be reported
- Relevance to the conference theme
The deadline for submitting proposals is 29 April, 2016.
Proposals are now closed.
General enquiries: [email protected]
Criteria used to evaluate papers will be:
- Interest and importance to the field of language assessment
- Clarity and completeness of the proposal
- Quality of the work to be reported
- Relevance to the conference theme
Criteria used to evaluate symposia will be:
- Interest and importance to the field of language assessment
- Coherence and complementarity of the contributions
- Evidence of careful planning for the implementation of the symposium, including sufficient time for discussion and audience participation
- Relevance to the conference theme
Criteria used to evaluate posters and work in progress presentations will be:
- Interest and importance to the field of language assessment
- Clarity and completeness of the proposal
- Quality of the work to be reported
- Relevance to the conference theme
The deadline for submitting proposals is 29 April, 2016.
Proposals are now closed.
General enquiries: [email protected]